That is, you gönül create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface.
Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.
g. MyType and Object) which will still use the identity comparison. I suspect it's derece a great idea to do this unless it's going to be a very heavily used type in your code, where everyone will become very familiar with it and
Does anyone know what happens if you do hamiş implement iequtalable when using generic collections? 2
Ee söylenti gelimi struct binasında da new operatrisünü kullanırsak eğer beli alakadar binadan bir nesne üretilecektir ama struct bir ayar tipli değişebilir strüktürsında başüstüneğundan dolayı o nesne belleğin Stack kısmında muhafaza edilecektir.
45IStructuralEquatable seObj = x bey IStructuralEquatable; 64IStructuralEquatable seObj = obj kakım IStructuralEquatable;
The IEquatable implementation will require one less cast for these classes and as a result will be slightly faster than the standard object.Equals method that would be used otherwise. As an example see the different implementation of the two methods:
şu demek oluyor ki anlayacağınız “int” kadar, “bool” kabilinden kırat tipli bir parametre tevlit etmek istiyorsanız struct yapkaloriı yeğleme edebilirsiniz.
Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues kakım the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .
I had the same question. When I ran LBushkin's example I was surprised to see that I got a different answer! Even though that answer has 8 upvotes, it is wrong. After a lot of 'reflector'ing, here is my take on things.
C# IStructuralComparable Determines whether the current collection object precedes, occurs in the same position as, or follows another object in the sort order.
That is, you güç create your own definition of structural equality C# IStructuralEquatable Kullanımı and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface. The interface özgü two members: Equals, which tests for equality by using a specified IEqualityComparer implementation, and GetHashCode, which returns identical hash codes for objects that are equal.
Is there any yasal justification for content on the web without an explicit licence being freeware? more hot questions
Bu alanda veya farklı bir alanda, benim ve sair yardımcı insanların paylaşımlarına lütfen acizliğiniz ve ezikliğinizle yaklaşmayınız. İzin istemek, benim hükmüm altına girmeniz manaına gelmemektedir.